Strictly Feminism

  1. Search
  2. Subscribe
  3. Archive
  4. Random
Newer
Older
  • For maybe the past decade or so, little girls have inhabited a universe that is, almost entirely, pink. It is made up not just of pink princesses and fairies and ballerinas and fluffy bunnies, but of books, bikes, lunchboxes, board games, toy cookers, cash registers, even games consoles, all in shades of pink.

    This Christmas is no exception. There is a pink globe, specially for girls. Scrabble has been repackaged in pink (the tiles on the front of the box spell FASHION). Monopoly has gone pink, with the dog, thimble and shoe pieces replaced by flip-flops, a handbag and a hairdryer, houses and hotels becoming boutiques and malls, and utilities turned into beauty salons. In at least one major supermarket chain you can now buy slices of bright pink ham, cut into heart shapes and called Fairy Hearts.

    Something, plainly, has changed. “There’s been,” says Abi Moore, a 38-year-old freelance television producer, “a wholesale pinkification of girls. It’s everywhere; you can’t escape it. And it needs to change. It sells children a lie – that there’s only one way to be a ‘proper girl’ – and it sets them on a journey, at a very, very early age. It’s a signpost, telling them that beauty is more valued than brains; it limits horizons, and it restricts ambitions.”

    The power of pink | From the Guardian | The Guardian (via amberlrhea)

    I think what’s going on with pinkification is a little more complicated than that. It’s saying to girls that they can be smart (read books, play Scrabble) or successful (Monopoly) or even like sports (as fans: how many pink versions of sports team apparel have you seen?) BUT they must, at the same time, never fail to fit a socially-approved notion of femininity. They have to wear the right color and look pretty.

    Patriarchy is trying to compromise here, but it’s not really not a compromise because patriarchy isn’t giving us anything. That girls now have permission to be smart or play sports, to the extent that they do, is because of the struggles of girls and women, not the benevolence or even the grudging agreement of patriarchy.

    (via ekswitaj)

    I [have been socialized to] love pink, but pink Scrabble?  NO.

    (via katoleary)

    Posted on December 21, 2009 with 47 notes

    Source: amberlrhea

    1. mulberry------outlet liked this
    2. sierraforpeace liked this
    3. ageofcriminals liked this
    4. ashleyapril liked this
    5. stlyma reblogged this from katyisntfunny
    6. soundonsound liked this
    7. lightedwindows reblogged this from maura
    8. jaejeb liked this
    9. mondosmusicbox liked this
    10. katyisntfunny reblogged this from meganwest
    11. katyisntfunny liked this
    12. sailingonthesea liked this
    13. thestrain reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
    14. thehaitianqueen liked this
    15. erikawithac liked this
    16. wintermelontea reblogged this from ocean-bright-wine
    17. wintermelontea liked this
    18. beautyinthefilth liked this
    19. champagnecandy reblogged this from ocean-bright-wine
    20. inopia liked this
    21. bronwynlewis liked this
    22. itsthemusicpeople liked this
    23. turnabout reblogged this from maura
    24. charmingpplincardigans liked this
    25. therealjanelle liked this
    26. nerdshares liked this
    27. vladislava liked this
    28. thehustla reblogged this from strictlyfeminism
    29. librarianpirate liked this
    30. jaimeleigh liked this
    31. kelsium liked this
    32. ocean-bright-wine reblogged this from amberlrhea
    33. amberlrhea posted this

Field Notes Theme. Designed by Manasto Jones. Powered by Tumblr.